Librarything and our new catalog interface.

One interesting aspect of Librarything is that they have been developing some “OPAC-boosting” products that allow libraries to populate their catalogs with user tags from the Librarything database. Here’s a post from their development blog describing their work with Danbury Public Library: http://tinyurl.com/39ss4k

A few months after completing out the Danbury catalog project, Librarything announced a partnership with AquaBrowser. Their partnership has resulted in a new AquaBrowser feature called “My Discoveries.” This is great news for my library. We will be implementing our Aquabrowser catalog with My Discoveries soon, allowing our patrons to access all sorts of librarything-esque features like tagging, making lists and rating & reviewing their books. For a nice summary on the Librarything & AquaBrowser partnership, check out this Librarything blog post: http://tinyurl.com/29zlkw

I heart Librarything.

I have had a Librarything account for a while now, and I’m definitely a fan. I’m getting close to the 200 book threshold for free accounts and think I will take the plunge and buy the lifetime account. I set my account up back when I was first working as a public librarian and wanted it as a tool for reader’s advisory. It works like a charm. I frequently look over my Librarything account for suggestions for patrons at the desk. So far I have only used the basic features of librarything–I’m only a member of one group and have no friends (unless bookbanter approves me)–so I still feel like there’s a lot to explore. 

Recently I tried a Librarything alternative (Goodreads) out. I like Goodreads too–the social networking aspect is much more central to the Goodreads experience, and I quickly found colleagues on the site to share books with. But I don’t think I’m going to stick with Goodreads–I’ve gotten used to Librarything and having two book tracking accounts is just too much to manage.

Book tweets update

Well, after a day of tweeting and following other tweets, I’m starting to see the fun in it. I saw that some of my colleagues were communicating with each other about work via twitter–seems like a neat, efficient way to send strategic communications when working on different service desks. Some tweets are just plain hard to decipher and there are times of the day when the pace picks up so much it is really disorienting to check in if you’ve been away for awhile. I guess that’s where the addictive part of twitter comes in-it’s more fun to stay connected all the time. 

Anyway, someone posted a link (http://tinyurl.com/4lmsfb) to an article about how Goodreads is now offering a twitter feature–very similar to the bookkpr app I posted about yesterday. Except it is even better because everything is tied in with your Goodreads account. Why is Librarything sleeping on this?

Twitter time

I set up my account–I’m “cloglog”–found some people to follow, and have a few people following me. Problem is, I just don’t know what to say to twitter land. I’ll be a meek follower for a bit while I figure out what makes for good twitter conversation.

In the meanwhile, I’m also experimenting with bkkeepr, a slightly buggy twitter app that allows you to track your reading by “tweeting” the ISBN of whatever your reading with commands like “begin”, “end”, or the page number. Here’s the how-to page if you’re interested: http://bkkeepr.com/how

Maybe I’ll try a non-linear approach this time…

Okay, I keep trying to get the ball rolling on this Web 2.0 thing but other stuff just keeps getting in the way. As you can see, I never got around to posting Flickr vacation pictures, but I have always been terrible at personal picture management. I probably set the bar too high.

Flickr is pretty darn fascinating and I am most impressed by the LoC project. I wonder how many other photo archives will follow in their wake? I once had the job of handling permissions for the image copying department at a private historical society. At the time we were spending a lot of time evaluating our options for getting our images online–but not merely to share, rather to generate revenue to support the organization.  Our goal was to make money on selling high quality reproductions of items from the collection and more lucratively, to charge permission fees for each and every use. This meant we needed to carefully track uses of our images. I think putting things up on Flickr would not have been considered a viable option at the time. (Although I guess we could have put up tiny files with watermarks, but that seems kind of antithetical to Flickr.) I looked around on Flickr to see if the particular organization I had worked for had anything form their collection up–Ironically, the only shots I found were from visitors to the collection, but nothing from the rights and repro office. So, I guess if it is going to happen anyway…

Another interesting thing about Flickr is the prominence of Creative Commons licenses (http://creativecommons.org/about/), which I understand to be an alternative to traditional copyright protections. They’re all over Flickr.  I wonder if anyone has gone to court over a creative commons license yet?

Oh, yeah, about the non-linear approach…I think I’ll skip ahead to Flickr next. I hear it’s a lot of fun. I’ll double back for the other stuff later.

Flickr article

Just wanted to share an interesting NYT Magazine article about some of the most successful Flickr artists:

http://tinyurl.com/6rzfwe

I’ll share some vacation pictures soon.

Starting point

This blog will serve as a record of my exploration of a handful of Web 2.0 technologies. Here we go!